<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Foreign Policy &#8211; INTERSECURITYFORUM</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.inter-security-forum.org/tag/us-foreign-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.inter-security-forum.org</link>
	<description>Energy Security for Cyprus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The United States Abandoned the Kurds. Who is Next?</title>
		<link>https://www.inter-security-forum.org/the-united-states-abandoned-the-kurds-who-is-next/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EDITOR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurasian Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syrian Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inter-security-forum.org/?p=727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the report of the Cypriot Minister of Defence, presented last week to the Parliamentary Committee on Finance in the framework of the state budget for 2020, special attention is paid to the prospects for the development of military cooperation between Nicosia and Washington. A special working group is envisaged that will promote such bilateral [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In the
report of the Cypriot Minister of Defence, presented last week to the Parliamentary
Committee on Finance in the framework of the state budget for 2020, special
attention is paid to the prospects for the development of military cooperation
between Nicosia and Washington. A special working group is envisaged that will
promote such bilateral cooperation. Statements about ‘strategic partnership’
between Cyprus and the United States have also regularly been put out by the Cypriot
Foreign Minister since the signing of the joint Declaration between David and
Goliath (November 2018). But is the embrace of the Americans a worthy and
lasting one?</p>



<p>The last striking
example of the consequences of <br>
‘alliance’ with the United States is undoubtedly the plight of the Syrian
Kurds. Much ink has been shed about the American betrayal in the entire world&#8217;s
mass media. Why does the US destroy the self-confidence of its allies giving
rise to serious doubts? Nothing is strange: Washington pursues the policy
considered appropriate in each case and moment in time. In this regard,
Washington has increasingly abandoned its allies as soon as its goals are
achieved. This is the spirit of US policy.</p>



<p>Take for
example the treatment afforded by the United States to Japan, its main Asian
ally. Washington has persistently been engaged in Tokyo’s arms twisting,
projecting the threat from China and North Korea. Thus forcing Japan to follow
Washington’s quest for supremacy in East Asia. In this case, the US refer to
the bilateral treaty on mutual cooperation and the 1960 security guarantees,
according to which they have the right to station armed forces and establish military
bases on Japanese territory. However, as Bloomberg recently reported, the White
House is seriously considering withdrawing from the Treaty, leaving Tokyo alone
to worry about Japan’s security. </p>



<p>Is the
Treaty signed by the United States and Greece during Pompeo&#8217;s recent visit to
Athens, not of a similar nature? The transfer of American troops to Greek
territory continues in full swing. </p>



<p>The White House
employs the same scenario in the development of relations with the countries of
the Persian Gulf: the looming ‘threat’ in the Gulf scenario is Iran. Furthermore,
in the case of the Baltic and Eastern European states, Russia is the projected ‘threat’.
It is not a far-fetched scenario the leadership of these countries wakes up one
day and find themselves in the position the Syrian Kurds are today: that is to
say a bargaining chip in American foreign and domestic policy.</p>



<p>The US ‘friendship’
with Armenia, one of Cyprus’ main partners, is also indicative. The government
of Armenia, which has made a bet on the development of relations with the West,
is likely to be abandoned by its American patrons by direct analogy to the
Kurdish case. It is possible that the Armenian friends of George Soros, who
consistently put the fate of Armenia in the hands of the OSCE Minsk Group and NATO
officials, will face a very sad fate. If the Armenians are led to believe that
the United States are the guarantor of Nagorno-Karabakh&#8217;s independence, they
are seriously mistaken. </p>



<p><strong><em>Oil Interests Guide US
Foreign Policy</em></strong></p>



<p>Last week
Washington threw off its mask openly stating the true purpose of stationing US
troops in Syria: oil! The war on terrorism on the territory of this unfortunate
country was only <br>
a smokescreen. Washington cares only about Syrian oil. The United States in
order to maintain control over the oil fields in northeastern Syria, will
apparently, stop at nothing.</p>



<p>The US
administration estimates revenues from Syrian oil smuggling to the tune of $45
million per month. At the same time, the Syrians will not have any profit at
all from the production of their own oil by the Americans. What else than an
outright robbery of Syria by the United States? Part of the money from oil is
returned to Syria exclusively in the form of new armed terrorists, while, in
fact, all this oil belongs to the Syrian people and no one else. </p>



<p>Moreover, the
White House recently expressed interest in a deal with oil giant ExxonMobil to ‘use’
Syrian oil assets. Yes, it is ExxonMobil, on which so many hopes are pinned by
the Cypriot government. We wonder how our government and public will react to
the potential participation of this company in the plunder of the natural
resources of a sovereign state. Silence and indifference have always been the
easiest way out of difficult situations. But then all our reproaches of Ankara
with illegal activities in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cyprus would pale.</p>



<p class="Asia Europe Security Foreign Policy Syria US Kurds">It is not
easy to choose allies and partners. Even worse when &#8220;chosen&#8221; as ally,
the US pursue their narrowly defined national interest. We can continue to
pretend that nothing is happening, to entertain illusions and hopes about a
happy future in the American embrace. However, common sense suggests that now
it is necessary to wake up and seriously think about whether we are on the
right path. A range of countries, including seemingly powerful blocs such as
the European Union, are increasingly realizing how they have been used by the
Americans and hastily trying to get rid of this dependence. Doing so whilst the
neck is in the loop is not so easy. It is much easier not to get to this point
at all …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Drives Europe in a Vicious Circle of anti-Russian Sanctions</title>
		<link>https://www.inter-security-forum.org/us-drives-europe-in-a-vicious-circle-of-anti-russian-sanctions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EDITOR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 06:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurasian Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions on Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inter-security-forum.org/?p=523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Blackmail and force pressure remain the primary tool of American diplomacy. The U.S. continues to pressure the EU on the ‘necessity’ of sanctions against Russia. However, with the passage of time an increasing number of European countries are resisting the imposition of U.S. policy toward Russia. The Greek leadership is clearly aware that anti-Russian sanctions, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackmail and force pressure remain the primary tool of American diplomacy. The U.S. continues to pressure the EU on the ‘necessity’ of sanctions against Russia. However, with the passage of time an increasing number of European countries are resisting the imposition of U.S. policy toward Russia.<br />
The Greek leadership is clearly aware that anti-Russian sanctions, to which Washington force them, cause enormous damage both to the Greek economy, which is in deep recession, and to the long-standing, historical relations between Greece and Russia. But all this does not matter for Washington, which is accustomed to dictating the policy terms to its European partners, forcing them not to follow their national interests, but the American ones. The unbending US policy is causing growing discontent in Eastern Europe. The leaders of Hungary, the Czech Republic, Serbia, Slovakia, FYR of Macedonia do not hide their irritation due to the pressure exercised by Washington, seeking to make them puppets instead of leaders of sovereign independent states, The US steadily drives them to compliantly execute any order from the State Department.<br />
It is clear that the United States of America have no significant trade or investment relations with the Russia Federation. Therefore, unleashing the economic and financial war against Russia, America is not particularly at risk. But for Europe and for Ukraine, this multi-faceted war, economic and otherwise, surely spells disaster.<br />
Russia has been for long years the guarantor of stability of the European energy market. It supplies almost half of the oil and a third of the total gas consumption of these energy resources to the EU. Certain European countries totally dependent on Russian gas supplies. In the case of freezing of funds in foreign accounts of Russian state-owned companies and trade embargo, the EU will come to a total collapse of its economy.<br />
A significant amount of investment and loans also binds Europe with Russia. In the case of continuing economic warfare these assets will also be lost. This will lead to falling profitability and bankruptcy of a number of companies and banks, to falling European stock market, hence rising unemployment.<br />
Thus, sanctions and trade war against Russia benefit only the U.S., which kills two birds with one stone, deciding their goals both towards the EU and towards Russia.<br />
After all, it is important to understand what Ukraine, the ‘unsuccessful younger brother’ is for Europe. Kiev faces enormous challenges. Deep recession puts the national economy in a precarious position.<br />
In addition, the European financial stability mechanism is not designed to load in hundreds billions of euro into the Ukraine. If Brussels decides to save the Ukrainian economy from total collapse, the task will be overwhelming. Such an eventuality will not in the least please the governments of the Euro-zone member states.<br />
As a result of such assistance to Ukraine, which is not even an EU member, it is estimated that EU economies will recede further by 15 to 25 per cent. And this can lead to a withdrawal of a number of southern European countries from the EU (Greece is the first likely example of such a situation). The collapse of the Euro-zone and consequently of the entire EU is a nightmare scenario – an affront to the many enlightened European statesmen who have been building the ideal of a single Europe in the past decades. Such a nightmare is in danger of becoming a reality – because of the ill-conceived Washington propelled policy on Ukraine.<br />
Is it worth pulling the fate of the European economy into the Ukrainian card being played by the US? Europe, if left alone to decide, will probably answer no. Would it not be better Europe and Russia take joint steps to stabilize the situation in Ukraine? Primarily through the formation of responsible government in Kiev, capable of ensuring peace and observance of its commitments.<br />
It is prudent to give the Ukraine an opportunity to live and develop, to be a stable and predictable partner than to turn the central European terrain into a ‘black hole’ that undermines Europe&#8217;s stability and economy, and also becomes a handy tool serving the U.S. for confrontation with Russia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
