<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EEZ &#8211; INTERSECURITYFORUM</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.inter-security-forum.org/tag/eez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.inter-security-forum.org</link>
	<description>Energy Security for Cyprus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 09:45:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Lobby for Cyprus: Sir Alan Duncan Misleads Parliament over Cyprus EEZ</title>
		<link>https://www.inter-security-forum.org/lobby-for-cyprus-sir-alan-duncan-misleads-parliament-over-cyprus-eez/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EDITOR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 09:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Alan Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inter-security-forum.org/?p=711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In an open letter addressed to Jeremy Hunt, Foreign Secretary, the London based UK charity registered organization Lobby for Cyprus (LfC) accuses Sir Alan Duncan, Minister of State for Europe and the Americas, Foreign &#38; Commonwealth Office, of &#8216;knowingly misleading Parliament&#8217; over the issue of sovereignty in Cyprus southern waters. In addition, in a scathing [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-background has-pale-cyan-blue-background-color">In an open letter addressed to Jeremy Hunt, Foreign Secretary, the London based UK charity registered organization <em>Lobby for Cyprus</em> (LfC) accuses Sir Alan Duncan, Minister of State for Europe and the Americas, Foreign &amp; Commonwealth Office, of &#8216;knowingly misleading Parliament&#8217; over the issue of sovereignty in Cyprus southern waters. In addition, in a scathing criticism of the FCO&#8217;s ill-conceived Cyprus policy, LfC argues that Sir Alan <em>damaged British interests by undermining Anglo-Cypriot relations and fuelling calls for the Republic of Cyprus to take robust action over the remnants of the Crown Colony of Cyprus known as ‘the Sovereign Base Areas&#8217;</em>. Last but not least, LfC calls on the British Government to take punitive action against Turkey, as Ankara has been repeatedly violating international law over its approach to the sovereign independent Republic of Cyprus.</p>



<p>The full text of the open letter to the FCO Secretary is as follows:</p>



<table class="wp-block-table"><tbody><tr><td>The Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP&nbsp;<br>Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs<br>Foreign and Commonwealth Office<br>King Charles Street<br>London SW1A 2AH&nbsp;<br><br>17 May 2019<br><br>Dear Minister<br><br>I am writing to you regarding the reply given by the Rt Hon Sir Alan Duncan KCMG MP, Minister for Europe, in response to the oral question asked by Bambos Charalambos MP during Foreign Office Questions on Tuesday 14 May 2019 regarding Turkey’s invasion of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the Republic of Cyprus.<br><br>The response given by Sir Alan was as follows: “The position of the UK is that, in line with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, exploratory drilling should not proceed in any area where sovereignty is under dispute.”<br><br>I expected more from Sir Alan, a Minister of a country which prides itself on standing up for international law and the rule of law generally.<br><br>In September 2018, in blatant disregard for international law, Turkey begun threatening to drill for hydrocarbons in the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus. On or about the 4 May 2019, the Turkish vessel Fatih and its support ships entered the EEZ of the Republic of Cyprus. In 1974, Turkey systematically breached the law by invading, occupying and ethno-religiously cleansing 36 percent of the territory and 57 percent of the coastline of the Republic of Cyprus. Now, Turkey has sent its drilling ship and support vessels to break the law once again, not least by engaging in theft, plunder and pillage.<br><br>Turkey has no moral or legal right to appropriate for itself hydrocarbons lawfully belonging to the Republic of Cyprus. Bearing in mind that Turkey has been the occupying power in the northern area of Cyprus since 1974, any arbitrary extraction of Cypriot natural gas by Turkey would not only violate the United Nations Charter of 1945 and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 (UNCLOS). It would also constitute a war crime. Under Article 33.2 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949: “Pillage is prohibited”. &nbsp;Moreover, under Article 8.2(b)(v) of the Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court of 1998, pillage is a war crime.&nbsp;<br><br>It is no surprise that Turkey has failed to sign either UNCLOS or the Rome Statute.<br><br>On 4 May 2019, Federica Mogherini, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy / Vice President of the EU Commission, expressed “grave concern over Turkey&#8217;s announced intention to carry out drilling activities within the exclusive economic zone of Cyprus”. Ms Mogherini urgently called on Turkey “to show restraint, respect the sovereign rights of Cyprus in its exclusive economic zone and refrain from any such illegal action to which the European Union will respond appropriately and in full solidarity with Cyprus.”&nbsp;<br><br>It was most disappointing that the UK has not also taken a principled stance on this latest violation by Turkey. On the contrary, the ministerial answer by Sir Alan effectively constitutes a hostile act with the ability to destabilise an already volatile region. &nbsp;<br><br>Sir Alan’s answer appears to have been a premeditated and considered response which challenges the sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus, a fellow member of the United Nations, Council of Europe, European Union and the Commonwealth. Indeed, Sir Alan appears to have engaged in a dangerous form of appeasement reminiscent of the UK’s capitulation to Germany when Hitler was bullying Czechoslovakia in 1938.<br><br>What is already clear is that Sir Alan’s answer has damaged British interests by undermining Anglo-Cypriot relations and fuelling calls for the Republic of Cyprus to take robust action over the remnants of the Crown Colony of Cyprus known as ‘the Sovereign Base Areas’. &nbsp;<br><br>Sir Alan and you, as his ministerial superior, must correct the public record by confirming that the UK fully respects – and does not dispute – the sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus. Both of you should also issue an urgent warning directed towards Turkey. &nbsp;The warning must include a demand that Turkey ceases its operations in the EEZ of the Republic.&nbsp;<br><br>I remind you that paragraph (2) of the House of Commons Resolution on Ministerial Accountability, as agreed on 19 March 1997, and paragraph 1.3.c of the Ministerial Code, as updated in January 2018, both state the following:&nbsp;It is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity. Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the Prime Minister.Accordingly, subject to your response to this letter, I reserve the right to refer this matter to the Prime Minister under paragraph 1.4 of the Ministerial Code under which:&nbsp;It is not the role of the Cabinet Secretary or other officials to enforce the Code. If there is an allegation about a breach of the Code, and the Prime Minister, having consulted the Cabinet Secretary feels that it warrants further investigation, she will refer the matter to the independent adviser on Ministers’ interests.The UK and the international organisations to which it belongs must additionally take concrete action to hold Turkey accountable. As the ‘penholder’ of UN Security Council Resolutions regarding Cyprus, the UK is in a strong position to initiate such action. &nbsp;Measures must be imposed forthwith on Turkey, for example via punitive measures, Turkey must also be punished for acting as an occupying power and as a sustained source of instability in the Eastern Mediterranean region.&nbsp;<br><br>The citizens of the Republic of Cyprus, particularly its forcibly displaced citizens, have long paid the price of international tolerance of Turkey. It is time that this tolerance ended. &nbsp;<br><br>If, however, the UK fails to act, it risks aligning itself ever more closely with a rogue state. Its reputation as a guardian of international law will also be tarnished, if not destroyed.<br><br>I look forward to your response to this letter.<br><br><em>Lobby for Cyprus</em></td></tr></tbody></table>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unbearable Lightness of Schulz Cyprus Journey</title>
		<link>https://www.inter-security-forum.org/the-unbearable-lightness-of-schulz-cyprus-journey/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Yiorghos Leventis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Mediterranean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurasian Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus Settlement Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDEK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Schulz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inter-security-forum.org/?p=545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is a truism to say there is a price to everything in the world we live in. As more and more ‘atmospheric’ noise is made by international actors (UN, EU) about the imminence of a Cyprus settlement, it is vital that we shed at least some light on the real cost of the settlement [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a truism to say there is a price to everything in the world we live in. As more and more ‘atmospheric’ noise is made by international actors (UN, EU) about the imminence of a Cyprus settlement, it is vital that we shed at least some light on the real cost of the settlement and pose the fundamental question of <em>who will be asked to pay the bill. </em>Such an exercise of estimating the multiple costs involved in the implementation of the three-state settlement &#8211; one Greek constituent state, one Turkish plus the international persona grata i.e. the (con) federal government that will link both &#8211; should be no doubt profound. It should go beyond the platitudes of ‘the settlement will bring prosperity’ type and ask the real question of who is going to finance such a solution; otherwise the exercise in which we are engaging is one of fooling ourselves.</p>
<p>As these lines are drawn, <strong>Martin Schulz</strong>, the Speaker of the European Parliament, sets foot on the island invited by <strong>Yiannakis Omirou</strong>, Cyprus’ House of Representatives Speaker, whose party EDEK, strongly opposes the Bizonal Bi-communal Federation as the negotiated form of political settlement. Certain interesting observations are in place in this regard: Martin Schulz has been the leader of the Socialist Group in the EP since 2004, the pivotal year that saw the overwhelming rejection of the UN plan for a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem. Seventy six per cent of the Greek majority population turned down the proposed plan which would have turned Cyprus, yet again, de jure, a vassal state, subordinate to Ankara’s whims.</p>
<p>Schulz has not done well his homework before accepting the invitation to visit the island republic. According to press reports, the EP Speaker will devote more time meeting <strong>Mustafa Akinci</strong>, ‘President’ of the illegal ‘TRNC’ regime than for his meeting with President <strong>Nicos Anastasiades</strong>, Head of the internationally recognized government, and fellow member state of the EU! This fact speaks volumes as to Schulz’s intentions.</p>
<p>Second, Martin Schulz fails to take into account the robust views on the Cyprus problem of his fraternal EDEK socialist party. In a recent meeting with <strong>Marinos Sizopoulos</strong>, EDEK party chairman, the latter complained to the author that relations with the European Socialists, chaired by Schulz, are strained because of EDEK’s Cyprus policy questioning the wisdom of implementing a BBF solution. Twelve years of frozen relations between the European socialists and their Cypriot counterparts should have been long enough a period of time for Martin Schulz, if he considers himself a statesman, to show leadership by seeking to engage with his Cypriot socialist colleagues listening to their legitimate concerns rather than shunning them off.</p>
<p>Instead, Europe’s Socialist leader places more emphasis on listening to Akinci, who aligns himself with Ankara’s fresh threats against the Republic of Cyprus, in response to the latter’s third licensing round for exploration in its legitimate Exclusive Economic Zone. (Akinci already started making complaints about the licensing whereas Cypriot government spokesman Christodoulides cleared the ground stating that the energy policy of the RoC is not under negotiation).</p>
<p>In failing to fairly put his ears on the Turkish-pillaged Cypriot ground, Herr Schulz unwisely made noises about an all-time ‘golden opportunity for a settlement’ before even setting foot on the violently-yet-forgotten raped island. He should have been better advised to fill his forerunner public statement with a call for Ankara <em>to pull out all its troops from the island and restitute the tens of thousands of Greek properties which she has confiscated through its puppet regime</em>.</p>
<p>If Martin Schulz insists on condoning Turkey’s attempt to get away with the huge compensation bill, he should tell us where the money will come from to settle the forty two year old bleeding Cyprus wounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
